Case study·Manufacturing· All cases· Download PDF

Global discrete manufacturer

Anonymized enterprise pattern: multi-plant demand planning and predictive maintenance brought onto one knowledge-graph fabric with live ERP and MES — so asset risk reshapes the schedule, not a side CMMS dashboard.

Context

A multi-plant discrete manufacturer ran demand and capacity in twin spreadsheets. Maintenance lived in CMMS. Expedites were meeting theater. No customer is named; outcomes are qualitative.

Challenge

Approach

Outcomes (qualitative)

One executable plan object. Fewer firefights between planning and maintenance. Clearer next-best actions for expedite vs wait.

Related reading

Frequently asked questions

What kind of manufacturer does this case describe?

A multi-plant global discrete manufacturer running demand planning and predictive maintenance against live ERP and MES data. The customer identity and commercial figures are anonymized.

What changed for the planning team?

Demand, capacity and asset health stopped living in separate tools. Planners worked from one constrained plan with the exceptions ranked, instead of reconciling extracts across plants each week.

Are the outcomes guaranteed?

No. Outcomes are described qualitatively because every network has different data quality, product mix and constraint structure. The pattern is transferable; the numbers are not a promise.

Download this case or book a manufacturing workshop.

Download PDF Request demo